Tekelec Blog
Home > SIP > FAQ: What are SIP-I and SIP-T?

FAQ: What are SIP-I and SIP-T?

May 19th, 2009by Adam Roach under SIP

SIP-I and SIP-T refer to two very similar approaches for interworking ISUP networks with SIP networks. In particular, they provide the means for conveying ISUP-specific parameters through a SIP network so that calls that originate and terminate on the ISUP network can transit a SIP network with no loss of information.

SIP-T was developed by the IETF — the same body that developed the SIP protocol itself — around the same time the most recent version of SIP was being developed (mid-2002). It is defined by RFC 3372, RFC 3398, RFC 3578, and RFC 3204.

SIP-I was developed by the ITU in 2004, and made use of most of the constructs defined in the IETF SIP-T effort. It is defined by ITU-T Q.1912.5.

SIP-I and SIP-T both define the mapping of messages, parameters, and error codes between SIP and ISUP. Both of them are fully interoperable with compliant SIP network components on the SIP network.

The key differences between SIP-I and SIP-T are:

  1. SIP-I defines a mapping from SIP to BICC (in additional to ISUP), while SIP-T addresses only the ISUP case, and
  2. SIP-T is inherently designed for interoperation with native SIP terminals, while SIP-I is restricted for use between PSTN gateways only.

SIP-I and SIP-T also define somewhat different mappings of information between the protocols, mostly in terms of converting from SIP error codes to ISUP cause codes.

The way SIP-I and SIP-T allow transparent transit of ISUP parameters through a SIP network is by attaching a literal copy of the original ISUP message to the SIP message at the ingress PSTN gateway; this ISUP message appears as another body on the SIP message (typically, a peer to an SDP body).

The SIP network ignores the extra ISUP body, processing the SIP message as it normally would. After the SIP service network performs any necessary modifications to the SIP message, it arrives at the PSTN egress gateway. This egress gateway uses the attached ISUP message as the basis for the ISUP message it will send; however, it first makes modifications necessary to match changes made to the SIP message during its traversal of the SIP network.

 

As mentioned before, with SIP-T, the messages may also terminate on the native SIP terminals in the network, which will ignore the extra ISUP body. Additionally, messages may originate from these SIP phones and terminate on the PSTN gateways, which will then generate a new ISUP message for the PSTN.

Putting this together in a call flow, a typical successful call setup from a PSTN terminal to another PSTN terminal through a SIP network can look something like this:

 

No related posts.

Categories: SIP Tags: , , , , , ,
  1. richard
    June 15th, 2011 at 13:42 | #1

    excellent article.. I am a bigginer to SIP and was confused on SIP I & T , thanks for the info

  2. Wilson kimonyo
    June 15th, 2011 at 13:43 | #2

    thanks, i have read alot of stuff but still not clear on the difference between SIP T & I now i know

  3. Diego Nadares
    June 15th, 2011 at 13:44 | #3

    Thanks a lot! It was very useful!

  4. Fatine
    June 15th, 2011 at 13:44 | #4

    Thank you for your articl.
    Taoufik

  5. Manoj
    June 15th, 2011 at 13:45 | #5

    Thanks,really it’s giving us a quick review for the basic aspects of I& T variants.

  6. eddy
    June 15th, 2011 at 13:45 | #6

    Thanks yr information

  7. Mohsen Bakmoradi
    June 15th, 2011 at 13:46 | #7

    Thank you for information

    If it is possible send for me basic and detail information about SIP-I , SIP-T ,SIP-Trunk , SIP-NNI

  8. Adam Roach
    June 15th, 2011 at 13:46 | #8

    Mohsen: For more information on the topic of SIP-I and SIP-T, see our other blog entries on these topics: http://blog.tekelec.com/blog/?Tag=SIP-T

    Also, you can watch the recording of a webinar I did on the topic here: http://www.tekelec.com/News-&-Events/?eventID=475

    Thanks for reading!

  9. Sip Signal
    June 15th, 2011 at 13:47 | #9

    SIP is characterized by its proponents as having roots in the IP group reasonably than the telecom trade though many different VoIP signaling protocols exist. While the H. 323 VoIP protocol has been traditionally more related to the ITU, SIP has been standardized and ruled primarily by the IETF. The two organizations have endorsed both protocols in some fashion.

  1. No trackbacks yet.
<% Response.Write("" & vbcrlf) %>